College of Letters & Science
Instructional Workload
1993-94
POLICY
The instructional workload policy of the College of Letters and Science
is to maintain a College-wide average of two group instruction sections
per instructional FTE per semester, and an average of two individual instruction
sections per FTE per semester. Each department will develop its own departmental
instructional workload policy, approved by the Dean.
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
This document describes the policy on instructional activities for the
College of Letters and Science and provides guidelines for creating more
detailed policies specific to the various schools, departments, and programs
within the College.
The mission of the College of Letters & Science is broad and complex,
requiring a great variety of instructional aims, methods, and settings.
The College's stated mission includes:
- providing an intellectual community in which students and faculty can
discover, examine critically, integrate, preserve, and transmit knowledge,
wisdom, and values;
- fostering undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research
in the liberal arts, encompassing the humanities, the arts, the social
sciences, and the physical and biological sciences;
- serving the liberal arts curricular needs of the applied and professional
schools and colleges of the University;
- encouraging interdisciplinary linkages;
- offering outreach programs to the citizens of Wisconsin.
All of these goals involve teaching. To accomplish such a range of goals
and to serve our diverse student population, flexibility in teaching assignments
and methods is of fundamental importance. This is particularly so on a
campus such as that of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where a significant
proportion of effort for many on the teaching staff is devoted to the
training of graduate students. Teaching therefore occurs--and should occur--in
numerous ways and in various places. In an active learning context such
as the College provides, we recognize that teaching occurs outside as
well as within the classroom and that such contexts are often of special
importance to our students.
The normal duties of a faculty member in the College of Letters &
Science include teaching, research, and service. This distribution of
effort means that the particular workloads of individuals within the College
will vary considerably. Even within a given department, proportions of
total workload devoted to one or another of the three major categories
of effort will reflect necessary differences.
The primary way the teaching mission is accomplished in L&S, however,
is through group instruction. Such instructional groups can be large or
small, but they are in any case constituted of registered students who
meet together regularly with an instructor. Such instruction may be in
one of several traditional forms: lectures, discussion classes, seminars,
field courses, workshops, studio or laboratory classes, for instance.
Level of instruction and pedagogical requirements of particular disciplines
dictate a variety of sizes for classes, ranging from large lectures to
one-on-one instruction in performance or other creative areas. Teaching
in any of these contexts involves a variety of corollary tasks that are
fundamentally necessary to successful instruction, including such activities
as preparing syllabi, selecting textbooks, insuring library access to
relevant texts, ordering supplies for classroom or laboratory use, creating
and grading written assignments, coordinating class planning with teaching
assistants, and giving constant attention to preparation for every class.
Another standard format for teaching is individual instruction. This
arises from a number of particular needs of the students in question,
such as the undergraduate honors thesis, Masters thesis, Ph.D. dissertation,
or Independent Study in a subject not otherwise available, all of which
require the student's formal registration but which the instructional
staff member assumes in addition to the duties in the Group Instruction
category mentioned above. All faculty members are expected to participate
in these instructional activities.
To maintain a dynamic instructional program and a vital College community,
fed by creative change and the constant flow of new knowledge, much activity
beyond the classroom is a necessary part of a faculty member's professional
life. Besides the primary teaching duties in the group instructional modes
listed above, and beyond the formal individual instructional activities,
faculty members mentor and advise students, develop new instructional
methods and materials, create and approve new courses, serve on committees
that foster and oversee the teaching mission, direct and oversee the administration
of large, multi-sectioned courses, train and advise teaching assistants
in their teaching apprenticeship, develop and contribute to continuing
education courses, engage in outreach activities, provide links with local
school districts, and other such activities. Although it would be rare
that any faculty member would do all of these things at any given time,
it is assumed that all faculty will participate in such work.
DEPARTMENTAL INSTRUCTIONAL WORKLOAD POLICY
In view of the fact that separate programs often have unique pedagogical
and programmatic considerations, each department will develop an instructional
workload policy appropriate to its mission and that of the College. Each
department will therefore define its specific mission and indicate how
it is implemented in the unit's instructional workload policy. Such policies
should consider the distinctive role of instructional academic staff members
(both continuing and temporary) and teaching assistants as well as faculty
members in fulfilling the department's teaching responsibilities. The
policy should specify how courses at various levels--Elementary, Intermediate,
and Advanced--are distributed as well as what rules govern the assignment
of individuals to different kinds of courses: seminars, large lectures,
pro-seminars, field courses, lab courses, etc., and how those assignments
are rotated.
Each departmental teaching policy will specify the usual number of formal
courses to be offered by each instructional staff member and indicate
the criteria used to determine the appropriateness and fairness of its
instructional assignments. Some comment on how the mix and distribution
of graduate and undergraduate instruction is assigned is required. It
is expected that within units there will be some differences in faculty
teaching loads, depending on how other duties are assigned. Some explanation
of the relationship between academic staff and faculty teaching loads
should be included. Consideration should also be given to how team-teaching
arrangements will be credited in order to achieve equitable distribution
of teaching duties while also encouraging collaborative instruction both
within departments and across departmental and disciplinary lines.
Each department's statement on its workload policy should specify:
- the process by which the policy was derived;
- a statement of the department's normal group and individual instruction
course load;
- the criteria by which exceptions to the normal workload policy are
to be made. While unusually heavy administrative or other duties sometimes
require reduced teaching assignments, it may also be that some staff members
would normally be assigned a higher-than-average amount of teaching if
their involvement in other areas of activity are less than the norm.
- a complete list of administrative and service responsibilities in
the department that carry a course reduction (specify the reduction).
Every department's instructional workload must be submitted to and approved
by the Dean of the College. Thereafter, departures from the approved department
policy must be approved in advance by the Dean. Such individual department
or program instructional workloads, and subsequent requests for change,
will be subject to the Dean's review to insure that they are consistent
with College policy.
The Dean will monitor instructional policy and practice in individual
departments by using, insofar as possible, established reporting mechanisms.
|